Create and Execute an Action Plan

An action plan is the method for transforming the process from its current state to the future state. This can be accomplished by using a combination of any of the six sigma methodology associated with best practices, and the appropriate tools from The Lean Toolkit. vsmactionplanThe action plan for this process resulted in dramatic improvement, ultimately reducing the lead-time to the customer from 8 weeks to 5 days. This was accomplished in a number of ways, beginning with the implementation of a Kanban system at the raw material sub-supplier. Waste was minimized in the manufacturing process in three ways: 1) Elimination of inspection by placing quality responsibility at the source, 2) Removing queue time by changing the flow from a push, to a pull process, and 3) Reducing the number of steps in each process. A summary of the dramatic results is shown in the attached figure. As the cycle repeats, further improvement could be achieved by implementing a Kanban system at the other end of the process; delivery of product to the customer.

 

 

Create a Future State Value Stream Map

Once the current state of the process has been established, which by the way, is usually the second “Ah-Ha!” moment for the company, the next step is to picture the desired state of the process; the future state. This is the point where waste identified in the current state is targeted for elimination. Find the areas of waste and problem areas and try to eliminate them by looking for low-effort high-benefit types of activities.

One of the biggest mistakes organizations make is to focus on reducing the touch time and ignoring the massive queue waste. For example, how can we reduce our machining time per part from 4.5 minutes to 3.5 minutes while not addressing the 2 days the product sits in queue after machining.

futurestate

Examples of this include 1) Reducing unnecessary inventory, 2) Pulling materials through visual controls, 3) Using 5S to make materials and tools available at the point-of-use, 4) Eliminating unnecessary steps, 5) Cross training personnel, 6) Standardizing work, 7) Reducing setup time, and 8) Balancing the work flow (Takt time analysis). The attached Figure illustrates the future state possibilities that can be accomplished by eliminating waste from this process.

Create a Current State Value Stream Map

Now, let’s turn this diagram into a Current State Value Stream Map. The original working session for developing a value stream map is very manual, and as I mentioned earlier, is best done on a white board or with Post-it Notes®. I prefer the flexibility of Post-it Notes®, and a real world working session using this technique is shown in the attached Figure. As you can clearly see, the current state map covers an entire wall, which is very typical when defining how a process is really operating.

Processmap

As the name implies, the goal is to find out how the processing is currently operating today, not how the SOP says things “should” be or how it was “designed” to be. The goal is to capture reality onto a piece of paper; the current state. Use a stopwatch for the time studies and determine the actual times where practical. While the VSM will eventually be finalized with software, the initial map should be created with Post-it Notes® because there will be frequent changes as the team goes through this process. Once the process has been defined, the Post-it Notes® map can be digitized with flowcharting software. Value stream maps use a variety of unique symbols that are not used in traditional flowcharts and diagrams, and while Word and Excel can be used for flowcharting, for ease of use, professional flowcharting software like Visio should be used.

As we discussed in an earlier article, one of the most critical steps in the value stream creation process is recognizing non-value (waste) in your process. Value stream mapping brings together lean concepts and techniques and helps to avoid the “cherry picking syndrome” in which processes that have very little impact on the product or service are chosen because they will be easy to improve.

Identify the Proper Process

This step cannot be stressed enough because it is often overlooked by many companies new to lean. Fresh out of training, the VSM team often runs out and starts mapping the first process they see. While value stream mapping anything is better than nothing, efforts should be focused on the critical processes having the greatest impact on the product.

Let’s look at a typical supply chain transaction from the point of a customer order through delivery of the product. This example shows a macro view of the supply chain cycle to illustrate how value stream mapping works. This high-level view would be one way to drive lean down through the supply chain to sub-suppliers. Of course, discrete processes within each supplier would need to be value stream mapped to enable reductions in their respective lead-times. The attached diagram depicts a product with an eight-week lead-time, which after value stream mapping the process, reveals that there are only 7 ½ hours of value-added time on this product. As unbelievable as these results sound, most organizations experience a similar disparity in their processes. The key takeaway of this scenario is that the excessive lead-time has created enough customer dissatisfaction that the business is in jeopardy.VSM

 

 

 

I remember the not-too-distant past when a 99% yield rate would earn you bragging rights (myself included). Looking at what that really means by today’s metrics show that a 1% scrap rate converts to 10,000 defective parts per million (DPPM). As a customer, imagine a supplier striving to give you only 1% defective parts! World-class six sigma levels allow only 3.4 DPPM. If you are still hanging in there with me at this point, I would hope that you agree that 10,000 DPPM is totally unacceptable and are prepared to do something about it.

Note: It must be mentioned that the 3.4 DPPM attributed to six sigma levels was developed by Motorola, and based on the assumption that over time a process is likely to have a shift in the mean of up to +- 1.5 sigma. This potential shift is factored into the 3.4 DPPM. Statistical purists would argue that a six sigma level is actually .002 DPPM, but since the Motorola interpretation is universally accepted, I use 3.4 DPPM to represent a six sigma level.

When organizations like Motorola and General Electric began communicating six sigma expectations to their suppliers in the early 1980s, what began as a ripple quickly developed into a shockwave throughout the supply chain. To say that this concept was met with some resistance is a monumental understatement. Companies had absolutely no idea how they were going to affect a change of such magnitude that their process defect rate would drop from 10,000 to 3.4 DPPM. Through a slow and painful process, companies began to understand that the way to achieve these quantum paradigm changes was through lean best practices. The interesting paradox is that none of us would accept 99% in our personal lives, so why do we accept it in our businesses? The attached Figure shows what life would look like if we settled for having things right only 99% of the time in some areas we can all relate to. This kind of changes the perception that 99% is good enough, doesn’t it?

notgoodenough1

Contrast this with a six sigma level in which your local weatherperson’s forecast would be correct every single day for 795 years in a row! (talk about a pipe dream; but that could be another whole article)

What is Six Sigma?

Sigma (σ) is the eighteenth letter in the Greek alphabet, and is defined and used in two different ways: 1) As a mathematical measure of the amount of variation in a process. This is normally referred to as the standard deviation of a process; the lower the standard deviation, the better, and 2) To describe the quantity of defects a process will produce. This is normally referred to as the sigma level of a process and is a measure of process performance; the higher the sigma level, the better. Although statistics are usually associated with six sigma, that is only part of it; six sigma is the problem solving methodology called DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control). DMAIC is a process that uses a collection of tools to identify, analyze, and eliminate sources of variation in a process. Six sigma can be an intimidating concept to grasp, particularly regarding the statistics and scary math part of the process. The key takeaway is that to achieve a six sigma level, process variation must be cut in half from a three sigma level.

Looking back through the annals of our industry, when it comes to quality, we have evolved from a reactive, to a proactive mindset. This evolution has lead to what is loosely called the Zero Defects Methodology (ZDM). The “old” gold standard of three sigma is no longer acceptable and has gone the way of the dinosaur.

Pipe Dream?

Are zero defects an achievable, sustainable goal 100% of the time? Of course not, but with six sigma levels we can come pretty close. Recognizing that we will occasionally fall short of any goal mandates that the goal be set at zero defects. The reasons why a zero defect mentality is required can be condensed down to the singular, bottom line principle of reducing costs, and as we all know, it’s always about the dollars. 4-quality-managementCosts are always attached to defective product in the form of inspection/test, rework/repair, scrap, & warranty (customer returns). Reducing these costs result in increased customer satisfaction, and quite simply, happy customers mean higher revenue.

Truth in Advertising

It is always an interesting study to compare the “advertised” capability of a company to their “actual” capability. The sales force touts world-class quality, which implies that they are operating at a six sigma level. However, an objective on-site assessment of their processes quickly separates the bluster from the facts, typically revealing that most organizations are operating at a true yield somewhere between 93 and 99%, the old three sigma complacency. Statistics are a wonderful tool, but like most things in life, you will only get out of them what you put in. It all boils down to what the organizational objective is; superficial window dressing or honest-to-goodness improvement. Inflating process yields by excluding things like rework, customer waivers, or returns do nothing but mask problems and will not result in true improvement. If window dressing is indeed your goal, then I would suggest tossing this article and immediately picking up a copy of Extinction for Dummies, by Peter T. Platypus.  However, if your goal is to utilize best practices to improve your business, stay tuned…

Next week we will explore why a 99% yield is not good enough!

Value stream mapping brings together lean concepts and techniques and helps to avoid the “cherry picking syndrome” in which processes that have very little impact on the product or service are chosen because they will be easy to improve. Value stream mapping forms the basis of an action plan (going from current state to future state), and illustrates the linkage between information and material flows. Like most things related to lean, or any initiative, there are some basic steps to follow when creating a value stream map. The process of value stream mapping is self-perpetuating; meaning that eventually the future state becomes the new current state and the cycle continues.

One of the most critical steps in the value stream creation process is recognizing non-value (waste) in the process. If we use the definition of value presented earlier in this book, waste will be anything that the customer is not willing to pay for. Value-adding activities are tasks that that transform (add value to) the product in some way. This transformation can take the form of either hard changes to the product, or soft changes such as brand vs. private label products. Each step, of each task, of each process needs to be objectively evaluated against this criterion to successfully identify wastes that can be eliminated. The following five principles can be used to guide an organization in this evaluation:

1)         Define value from the customer perspective

2)         Identify the value stream for each product family

3)         Make the product flow

4)         Create pull to build only what is needed, when it is needed, and

5)         Strive toward excellence.

Throughout the process analysis activity, it is critical to remain focused on the right things; activities that impact improvement of the organization’s products or services. Next time we will deep dive into the four critical steps of value stream mapping.VSM Pt. 5

PRESS RELEASE

November 4, 2014

Steve Williams had a clear message to EMS leadersThe world is flat on lean implementation; Think Different. Last week Mr. Williams, President of Steve Williams Consulting and 38 year industry executive, spoke to senior leadership of EMS companies at the IPC Tech Summit held in North Carolina, and discussed how lean can be implemented and effective in a HMLV (high-mix, low-volume) manufacturing environment.

Williams presented the tools, techniques and methodologies that thousands of small, custom manufacturers are using to dominate their markets. He urged a shift from the traditional “cost based” model to a “time based” model with a laser focus on lead-time reduction.  Organizations interested in learning more can contact Steve Williams at www.stevewilliamsconsulting.com.

Tech Summit

Every year I get together with a group of my good friends, Bobby, Dudley, Doug and Woody, all fellow Harley-Davidson enthusiasts, and take an epic ride to “parts unknown”. As we were sitting around the campfire one night during this year’s trip, I mentioned that I was writing the Quality 101 book and was struggling with fitting all of the available quality tools into one chapter. Doug, who has his own handyman show as his day job, said “Steve, it is all about having the right tools in your toolbox for the job at hand.”

Quality ToolboxAs is normally the case, my friend Doug had just condensed a complex problem down to a simple solution; develop a Quality Toolbox with only the most powerful tools that should be a day-to-day part of any quality professional’s arsenal. I have classified this toolbox into four categories: Process Analysis Tools, Data Collection & Analysis Tools, Problem-Solving Tools and Quality Planning Tools. While this toolbox is certainly not all inclusive, the set of tools contained in the chapter will provide a blueprint that any organization can use to develop, implement, and maintain a world-class quality system that supports a continuous improvement culture.

Buy now at http://www.quality101book.com/

 

 

“But we already made a process flowchart – isn’t that good enough?”

In a word, no. Process flow diagrams are a great first step, but they don’t tell the entire story. Value stream maps add one critical ingredient that standard process flowcharts don’t have; time. Process flowcharts, whether drawn by hand or electronically, do not capture this important element. They only simply present a snapshot of the sequence of steps in the process. Time is essential to understanding how one operation affects another and where your resources are being spent.

Value Stream Mapping

A value stream map (VSM) takes the basic flowchart to the next level, kind of like a process flowchart on steroids. In addition to the basic action boxes with arrows showing the flow of work, a lot of other information is added, including material and information flow, operating parameters, process lead-times, inventory, a timeline depicting value-added time relative to  non-value added time, and so on. Value stream mapping is the single most effective major process analysis step to identify the value stream, and conversely, the non-value waste in your processes. The value stream is the set of all the specific actions and activities required from the beginning of a process to the end of a process. Imagine a long and winding deep blue stream flowing through cities, counties, and states. Next, visualize all the things that the river carries within it: water, fish, minerals, plants and a thousand other elements which combine to form the stream. Processes are very much like a stream; they flow in a natural direction and carry materials and information within them from one point to another.

VSMThe activity of value stream mapping is the core fundamental method of identifying the areas of waste which can be eliminated within any process. By finding the sources of waste and quantifying them, action plans for reducing or eliminating them can be prioritized. Apart from identification, value steam mapping can also help to streamline a process for higher productivity and efficiency. Each process needs to have the beginning and end clearly identified before this can occur. This sounds simple, but since many of these discrete processes often run together, it is critical to define the boundaries of the process from a value stream standpoint.  Only through a detailed process analysis can you identify the non-value added steps that have become accepted, unquestioned parts of the process that result in “the way we have always done it.”

The Value Stream Map Paradox: Value stream mapping is the most effective lean tool for identifying high payoff opportunities, yet value stream mapping is the lean tool most likely not to be used by companies doing “Drive-By Lean”.